Glenn Reynolds has been covering the UN's sham "oil for food" program for some time, and he points to this post by Jan Haugland who makes an excellent point about which side really had the right to use that slogan:
Obviously, it was those who supported the war to remove Saddam Hussein that could justifiably have used the slogan "no blood for oil" against the opponents.
Feel free to post a comment below. Please see my comment policy.
Formatting Rules (No HTML):