Via Josh Claybourn, an article about Peter Lynds:
Lynds, a 27-year-old college dropout from New Zealand, had developed a radical new theory of time. Those who had glimpsed Lynds' ideas - which a physics journal has agreed to publish - were predicting they would shake the science world to its foundations and would solve philosophical and mathematical conundrums that have puzzled the best minds for thousands of years. Some were already comparing the young author with Albert Einstein.
His big idea, put simply, is that time cannot be thought of in physical, definable quantities. To the uninitiated that may seem obvious, but to some physicists it's heresy. Current thinking in quantum mechanics relies on time being made up of tiny, discrete packages - just like light and energy.
Lynds goes on to say there is no moment at which time can be considered to have stopped - even for an instant - and so an object's position can never be precisely determined at any time. He claims this has implications for everything from quantum mechanics to the theories of Stephen Hawking.
I read his paper tonight, and it is pretty awesome, though it takes effort to read and I probably missed the significance of some things. Under his system it seems that time is simply a consequence of matter. It seems very significant, and I'm interested in what other implications this has. I'm not going to summarize more than the article did -- the paper is definitely worth reading and thinking about.
What's funny is I think I came up with the same idea when thinking about Zeno's paradoxes. He argues in his paper that his theory is a solution to them -- I was thinking about them a while ago, and I was like "Duh, this is only a problem if you assume time isn't continuous." Of course I didn't go on to systematize it like Lynds did 
Actually, I remembered last night that I had thought it was only if you assume space isn't continuous, not time. But that brings up another question I was wondering about while reading the article - is space continuous? What implications does the article have for that? Anyway, the paper is very impressive - go read it.
Wednesday, August 20, 2003
Permalink
Hi,
S = N1/M/N2 times t
1 = Absolute Nothingness/Mass/Inbalance of N1 and M time 1
101010: On/Off = 42
100% or 1 is the wholeness of any order.
1/16 = 58-42 = 0.0625
3.141 - 3.125 = 0.016 (the difference of transindental and 360):
0.016 x 0.0625 = 1 ^-03
If an observer is at the center of a sphere which has volume, and the outside perimeter is converging evenly (just as time under Peter Lynds indicates), the observer can draw a line from him or herself to any presumed point on the perimeter and the vector will be linearly the same. The observer sees no coordinates to allow for a converging reality.
Essentially, matter can not be compressed indefinitely, so nothing can get to the absolute universal constant.....which is absolute vacuum or nothingness.....even though a negative pressure forces matter to move. Matter is said to be velocity dependent, and along these lines can indicate from 1 for spacetime to infinity.
360 degrees / 6 possibilities (where, A = N1 and B = Absolute mass; p = the coefficiency of this binary agreement 101010.
have 58 = N1 = 161608.3932990 nautical/miles/second (naut.C)
have 42 = M = 157079.6327 (or, 3.1415926535/.00002)
58/2 = 29
42/2 = 21........(if: 161608.3932990 - 157079.6327 = 4528.7605)
4528.7605/4 (due to 4pir^2 for surface length) = 1132.190125
1gm of mass = 1 infinite motion of time at 99% of nautC = 71 gms and 1 infinite motion of of spacetime.
100% broken down into 75% E/M and 25% Gravity:
58 + 21 = 79 (or, N1 + 2(M))
42 + 29 = 71 (or, M + 1/2N1); diff: 79-71 = 8
58-42 = 16
29 - 21 =8
Guv=8pi=25=guv; 29-4=25, and 21+4=25, where: 29pi+21Pi=157.0796327 (archimedes'pi/.02)
2(58)+21=137; 1/137 (alpha, inverse fine structure constant)
137.035989561(+-) x 1000 (where electron to neutron magnitude) = 1137.035989561
1137.035989561 x nautC (as 1.616083932990....decimal placement) = 1837.545592 (neutron/electron mass ratio)
1837.1042/1.6 = 1148.190125
1148.190125 - 1132.190125 = 16
186000 x 1.61 = 299460, so 1132.190125 x 1.616083932990 = 1829.714269 m/s and average neutron decay (free) based on 800 seconds of time.
58 - 42 = 16, and 16/16 = 1 (SQRT16 = 4) 4 x .0625 = .25 or 25%
where the difference of 75EM in relationship with 25Curvature in 1 dimensional spacetime.
Time = 1 x n1/m/n2
Robert Evans (This is my interpretation called ULTERIORTONICS).